Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Responses to blogs that I will put below Article
Responses to blogs that I will put below - Article Example While it is a great idea to implement such a law, I am skeptical that people would like to actively participate in the effective implementation of such a law until they find certain incentives in doing that. I think that such a law can be made more effective by developing a lottery scheme in which, people who have generated more material for recycling compared to others should be entitled to some rewards. It is up to the government to establish the minimum limit for such a competition and the rewards. In addition, government also needs to create awareness among the public on the benefits of recycling through tv programs and other forms of media so that people understand the importance of recycling and fulfill their responsibility toward the nation. Enforcing stricter punishments to discourage the act of littering is a very effective strategy to minimize littering. Punishment and fines are what people really care about and tend to avoid, and can thus be forced to deter from littering. However, in addition to implementing this law, an additional thing that the concerned authorities can do to decrease the amount of litter is installation of more trash bins. There is no doubt that there are a lot of trash bins everywhere in the US, but still if people are littering, this means that no matter how many of them have been installed, they are still not enough. People certainly need more trash bins to prefer using them on littering. Nobody would like to litter if a trash bin is in approach. In addition to this, government should introduce a scheme according to which people that have collected maximum litter throughout the year should be rewarded. It is up to the government to establish way of finding this out as there can be plenty of w ays. The law you have proposed serves to safeguard just one animal in particular whereas the medicinal benefits obtained provides health
Monday, February 10, 2020
Collective Bargaining in US Professional Sports Research Paper
Collective Bargaining in US Professional Sports - Research Paper Example All the professional athletes employed under the NFL clubs and other clubs in the United States professional sports league are unionized to form a better bargaining power. This is in accordance with the requirement of the National Labor Relations Act that wants that any employer must unionize its employees in order to be able to bargain in good faith. The other terms and conditions of employment the bargain covers include division of league revenues, free agency requirements, playersââ¬â¢ mobility restrictions, provisions regarding the drafting of players, disciplinary rules, among others. In this case, the employers are barred from making unilateral employment rules changes in regard to the issues required by the NLRA to be negotiated between the two parties-the employers and employees. Another issue that the National Labor Relations Board has found relevant to bargain about between the employers and the representative of the unionized employees are the drug policies that require testing. Therefore, for any setting or moderation of any drug policy, the union must bargain with the league. In this drug issue, it is reported that the NFL has a superior drug policy since it provides a comprehensive list of banned substances, keeps on testing players during the preseason, regular season, postseason and even during off-season, it gives the testing authority more discretion under the reasonable cause testing clause, applies beyond players to team personnel and provides harsher disciplinary to the violators of this policy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)