Explain the Differences Between Pangloss’s Philosophy Essay

Panglosss philosophical system of life is that all is for the go around in the best of all practical terra firmas. This optimistic philosophy actually is the keyst wiz element of Voltaires satire. Panglosss philosophy is against the ideas of the Enlightenment period. Pangloss believes that a powerful perfection had created the world and that, in that respectfore, the world must be perfect. When creatures of the world, see something as treat or evil, it is because they do not netherstand the even sotual(prenominal) well-grounded that go out come forth of it.Voltaire satirically shows the reader that Pangloss is not a believable character. Voltaire illustrates this by showing us that he keeps his optimistic thought even when he is impri intelligenceed. Pangloss ignores any evidence that contradicts his sign opinion. He as well uses illogical arguments to give birth his mental pictures. Panglosss philosophy tries to impose a passive attitude toward all that is wrong in the world. If the world is the best one possible, then there is no causal agent to make any effort to motley things.Martin is more believable than Pangloss, not because he is more sophisticated, exactly because he is smarter and more likely to draw conclusions with which we can identify. Martin had been robbed by his wife and beaten by his son and deserted by his daughter and too lived financial setbacks, and therefore hes a pessimist whereas Pangloss is an optimist. He uses his experiences to judge the world whereas Pangloss was merely using a theory. As a result, Martin is more insightful than Pangloss to anticipate events that will happen. even so though Martins philosophy is more believable than Panglosss, hes still not good at predicting how some people will behave because his philosophy is coming from radical pessimism. Therefore it might not be wrong to say that Voltaire is trying to conjure that we need flexible thought in our lives based on in truth evidence. bot h(prenominal) philosophers will ultimately fail because theres no room for exceptions in their beliefs. Candide starts his journey with the check of Panglosss belief of best of all possible worlds.Pangloss and Candide, accept and witness a wide garland of horrors and tragedies together. During these tragedies, Panglosss s philosophy proves to be useless and even destructive at the end, because it prevents them from making realistic judgments. For example sequence Jacques was drowning, Pangloss doesnt let Candide save him by saying that the bay of Lisbon had been make for this Anabaptist to drown in. Also when Candide was buried under the rubble of the Lisbon earthquake, he asked for oil color and wine because he was dying, but Pangloss do by him and still tried to reason with the causes of the earthquake.At the end Candide rejects his philosophy of optimism and as he and his servant Cacambo travel and go done more horrors, Candide starts believing a discouraged view of lif e. When Candide meets Martin, they set sail together and Martin is just the opposite of Pangloss. He does not believe that everything is for the best in this world. Even though Candide tries to oppose Martin by public lecture about free will but it does not solve the problem of front of evil in the world.In general, Martins arguments seem more reasonable than Panglosss ideas. But, like Pangloss, Martin believes so firmly in his own view of the world that he is not flexible and usually dismisses real evidence that contradicts his philosophy. When Candide cannot find Cunegonde, Martin shows the bad influence of his pessimism. Instead of attempting to comfort his friend, Martin uses Candides suffering to further confirm his own world-view. meet like Panglosss optimism, Martins pessimism also keeps him from taking initiative to improve the world.